NOSTRADAMANIA
- Share via
We at Griffith Observatory had our hands full with damage control during the Nostradamania and earthquake panic of May, 1988, when many self-proclaimed psychics and astrologers had their way with our collective psyche and predicted a catastrophic quake that never came.
I am therefore mystified by Malcolm Dean’s review of James Randi’s “The Mask of Nostradamus.” Almost half of the review was devoted to a discussion of the alleged “Mars effect” of Gauquelin (misspelled in Dean’s report as Gauguelin ).
Familiar with the history of that controversy, I know it has nothing to do with Nostradamus, James Randi or Randi’s new book.
Dean’s own investment in astrology makes him an odd choice as a reviewer of this book. Randi’s scholarship and emphasis should instead have been evaluated by a historian well informed on the cultural history of 16th-Century France.
E. C. KRUPP Ph.D.
Director
Griffith Observatory
LOS ANGELES
More to Read
Sign up for our Book Club newsletter
Get the latest news, events and more from the Los Angeles Times Book Club, and help us get L.A. reading and talking.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.